Liposomes as Advanced Delivery Systems for Nutraceuticals
Christopher W. Shade, PhD
Liposomes are delivery vehicles for transporting?substances into the body effectively via facilitating
absorption directly in the mouth or by preventing?breakdown by stomach acid. Since the 1970s,
liposomes have been investigated as potential drug?delivery systems because of their biocompatibility
and ability to incorporate both hydrophilic and?hydrophobic therapeutic agents. Despite early promise,
it was decades later, in the late 1990s to the present,?that liposome technologies could create successful
commercial products. Oral deliveries are recently?emerging as availability of quality phospholipids and
reliable homogenization and sizing equipment have?become routinely available. Nutritional industry use of?liposomes will grow rapidly in the next 5-10 y. High quality?products with more complex mixtures of pure?compounds and complex botanical mixtures will offer?clinicians less-invasive options for dosing and delivery?of these actives.
Christopher W. Shade, PhD, is president of Quicksilver?Scientific, LLC, in Lafayette, Colorado.
First discovered by British hematologist Alec?Bangham in 1961 (and first published in 1964),1
liposomes are delivery vehicles for transporting?substances into the body effectively via facilitating
absorption directly in the mouth2,3 or by preventing?breakdown by stomach acid.4 Since the 1970s, liposomes?have been investigated as potential drug delivery systems?because of their biocompatibility and ability to incorporate?both hydrophilic and hydrophobic therapeutic agents.?Drug delivery using liposomes has numerous benefits,?particularly in reducing the risk of toxic side effects, a?significant issue for chemotherapeutics, which often?exhibit high toxicity to healthy body organs and tissue.5,6
History and Development
Liposomes, more broadly, are one part of a family of?lipid-based deliveries, the most common of which is a simple?emulsion such as that found in a skin cream or foods such as?mayonnaise, where oil and water are brought together in a?time-limited stability. Emulsions use surfactants (molecules?with dual natures that can interact with both water and oil),?such as lecithin, to stabilize drops of oil in water (and oil-inwater?or O/W emulsion) or droplets of water in oil (a waterin-?oil or W/O emulsion). Though basic emulsions have been?understood for hundreds of years, when synthetic surfactants,?such as polyethylene glycols (PEGs) entered into use, the?creation of emulsions grew in sophistication and breadth of?application, including into drug delivery. Incorporation of?high-shear processing methods, such as sonication and?homogenization, to break down particle size, along with?more refined chemistry, allowed the size of dispersed?droplets to fall in the 10- to 200-nm range. This ability gave?rise to development first of micelles (particles composed of?surfactants with their lipophilic tails forming the core) and?nanoemulsions (particles with an oil core surrounded by a?monolayer of surfactants, Figure 1), and subsequently to?variations such as solid-lipid nanoparticles (SLPs, particles?with a solid lipid or
Figure 1. Nanoemulsion: Phospholipid Monolayer?Encloses a Liquid Lipid Core
wax core and monolayer or surfactants)?and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs, particles with a?core blend of solid and liquid lipids, favored for resisting the?crystallization SLPs are prone to that pushes contents out of?the particle). One of the great aspects of the sub-100 nm?particles is that the Brownian movement (random?vibration inherent in particles) of the particle exceeds the?force of gravity that moves the oils to the top and?previously required weighting agents. This creates higher?stability and longer shelf life and yields a characteristic?clarity (the particles are smaller than wavelengths of
visible light), whereas larger particle suspensions are?opaque or milky.7
Liposomes brought a very interesting proposition?into lipid deliveries: Instead of a surfactant stabilizing a?drop of oil in water, the phospholipids arranged into?spherical cell membrane?like lipid bilayers with their?water-loving ?heads? toward the aqueous medium and?their fatty ?tails? tucked toward each other. These?structures created pockets of entrapped water along with?water soluble compounds and the potential to protect?them from hostile digestive conditions and potentially
facilitating gastrointestinal (GI) uptake (see Figure 2). At?the same time, the hydrophobic fatty acid
Figure 2. Liposome: Phospholipid Bilayer Enclosing?an Aqueous Core
core of the?bilayers could host hydrophobic compounds, creating a?small spherical package that could carry both hydrophilic?and hydrophobic compounds. Interactions between the?liposome membrane and cell membranes further?sweetened the deal and offered a promise of enhanced?cellular uptake through endosomal mechanisms.8,9
Despite that early promise, it was really only decades?later, in the late 1990s to the present, that liposome?technologies could create successful commercial products,?and to date, most pharmaceuticals employ liposomes for?injectable drugs, where the liposomes can modify?distribution in the body and mitigate potential toxicities.6?Examples of pharmaceuticals in liposomal carriers are?doxorubicin, amphotericin B, nystatin, and vincristine.6
Oral deliveries are recently emerging as availability of?quality phospholipids and reliable homogenization and?sizing equipment have become routinely available.2,3
Bangham1 found that multilayered spherical?phospholipid structures spontaneously formed when
lecithin was dispersed in water. However, the evolution of?research showed that smaller was better. Various methods?applying shear force to the liposomes resulted in smaller,?more uniform size. These methods included freeze-thaw?cycles, rotor-stator dispersion, sonication, extrusion, and?high-pressure homogenization.10 The small-sized?liposomes were found to greatly increase kinetics of?absorption and lengthen circulation time.11
Due to the importance of size, classification of liposomes was most often based on size and layering of
liposomes. Multilamellar vesicles (MLV) were several?hundred nm (generally 100-400 nm) in diameter and
consisted of several concentric lipid bilayers with aqueous?interlayers; such were the first structures formed when?phospholipids were dispersed in aqueous media. Large?Unilamellar vesicles were larger, single-layer vesicles (>100?nm), and small unilamellar vesicles were single layer?vesicles (?100 nm, with a theoretical minimum of?approximately 20 nm).5,6,10
Phospholipids can be isolated from lecithins produced?from various seed oils (soy, sunflower, and canola being?available commercially) and from egg yolks and milk.?Lecithin and purified lecithin fractions are graded by the?percentage of phosphatidyl choline (PC) they contain.?Raw lecithins contain approximately 15% PC and higher?grades of lecithin fractions contain 50% to 95% PC.?PC has a rich history of use as a therapeutic and is?considered the most beneficial of the phospholipids and is?the most versatile for liposome formation. Soy?phospholipids have the longest history of use and there are
some excellent very-high PC sources of soy lecithin.?Unfortunately, with the backlash by the nutritional
industry on the soybean, an excellent, long-established?ingredient has been demonized. Such high-PC fractions?have no testable traces of the proteins or genes of the?parent plant. Sunflower PC has taken the place of soy in?many commercial nutritional liposomes, but the global?supply chain is currently tenuous as big food companies?also try to comply with consumer sentiment.
Phospholipids are therapeutic in their own right (not?only as carriers) and arguably the most broadly beneficial?of these is PC. PC is the main structural support of cell?membranes and a micellizing constituent of bile with a?long history of use in integrative and functional medicine.?Theoretically, stiffer phospholipids, such as?hydrogenated phospholipids and saturated phospholipids,?create stiffer membranes that may be better for GI?absorption, whereas unsaturated phospholipids from soy
or sunflower make a more flexible membrane that should?work better for intraoral absorption.2,3
Though phospholipids are almost a defining presence?in the liposome bilayer membrane, other surfactant and?nonsurfactant lipid molecules and surface modifiers have?been used to create more stable, absorbable, or long-lived?structures. The most common of these are food-grade?PEGs, oils such as medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs),?and membrane stiffeners such as cholesterol. Surface?coating for mucoadhesion include alginates, chitosan, and?hyaluronic acid.12
Liposomes are best characterized by size, and this?is?most easily done by dynamic light scattering (DLS), also?called photon correlation spectrometry, which uses scatter?patterns of laser light to determine mean size and size?population distribution.10 Absolute size and morphology?is usually confirmed with electron spectroscopy, but the?quintessential tool for research and development (R&D)
and stability testing in a liposome lab is the DLS unit.?Long-term stability is crucial and difficult to achieve,?in liposomes. Instability in the surfactant system is seen?most often in creaming, the rising to the top of free fats.?On the other end of the spectrum, sedimentation is the?falling out of insoluble compounds or combinations of?compounds. Either of these end points represents the loss?of potential in the system.10 A good, stable, liposome will?be seen to be a continuous single phase from top to the
bottom of a container, and the small liposomes, due to?their inherent clarity, are easier to see quality or
Ideal Composition for Increased Uptake and Reduced?Clearance
Liposomes, and other lipid particles, are cleared from?the blood by the reticulo-endothelial system (RES), also?called the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), a system?of monocytes and macrophages in the lymph nodes, liver,?and spleen that clear particles from the blood. Clearance is?inversely related to size, with the small unilamellar?liposomes/vesicles (SUVs) and micronized emulsions?circulating the blood the longest.13 The best products must?have a small mean diameter and a tight distribution of
sizes. Even if the mean size of a product is small, products?with a wide distribution of sizes may have a large volume?of the liposomes in nonideal size ranges.
Until recently, nutritional manufacturers have used low?to medium shear methods and with large lecithin loads,?producing either gel-phase products with very high?diameter particles of a large range of size (400-1000 nm) or,?with rotor-stator dispersion devices, milky liposomal?solutions of 200 to 400 nm. Small liposomes and emulsions?are the results of refined chemistry and high shear?equipment. Small liposomes may be drastically more?efficient at intracellular delivery of encapsulated compounds.
In a recent study, with carefully-sized liposomes, cellular?uptake increased 9-fold as liposome size was decreased?from 236 nm to 97 nm and was 34-fold higher at 64 nm.14
Modification of membrane surfaces with PEGs?further enhances the ability of liposomes and micronized?emulsions to avoid detection by the cells of the RES, thus?protecting it from liver and spleen clearance and?consequently prolonging its circulatory time.15 As a result?of these studies, a so-called stealth particle has emerged.?Stealth liposomes and micronized emulsions are made by?covering the carrier surface with hydrophilic chains, such?as PEG. A water soluble vitamin e derivative of PEG,
D-?-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS)?has emerged as a valuable, safe tool, for incorporation into?liposome membranes. Such coated liposomes and?micronized emulsions are more stable in biological?environments and can exhibit up to 10-fold higher?circulation half-lives than can liposomes without?hydrophilic surface coatings.15
Advantages of Liposomal Delivery
1. High bioavailability and absorption compared with?other oral forms of supplements.
2. Noninvasive; avoids pain and discomfort associated?with injections and decreases the contamination
3. Micronized encapsulation protects against the?harsh environment of the GI tract and increases
transmucosal (oral) uptake and absorption.
4. Increased intracellular delivery.
5. Can hold both hydrophilic and hydrophobic?compounds.
6. Ideal for those for whom swallowing a tablet is not?possible.
7. Allow for adjustable and incremental dosing for?children and adults.
8. Cost effective by being able to take a lower dose for?the same effect.
Potential Disadvantages of Liposomal Delivery
1. High current cost.
2. Possibility of poor manufacturing (eg, high particle?size, poor ingredients).
3. Possibility of instability.
4. Increased intracellular delivery.
Future Use In Nutraceutical Industry
There is no doubt that nutritional industry use of?liposomes will grow rapidly in the next 5 to 10 years. Most?potential negatives revolve around industry adoption of?reproducible, high-quality production techniques and?testing methods for characterizing size, stability, and?efficacy. As this hurdle is overcome, we will see exciting?high-quality products with more complex mixtures of?pure compounds and complex botanical mixtures.
1. Bangham AD, Horne RW. Negative staining of phospholipids and their?structural modification by surface-active agents as ovserved in the electron?microscope. J Molec Biol. 1964;8(5):660-668.
2. Silva AC, Santos D, et al. Lipid-based nanocarriers as an alternative for oral?delivery of poorly water- soluble drugs: Peroral and mucosal routes. Curr?Med Chem. 2012;19(26):4495-4510.
3. Rogers JA and Anderson KE. The potential of liposomes in oral drug?delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1998;15(5):421-480.
4. Patel HM and Ryman BE. Oral administration of insulin by encapsulation?within liposomes. FEBS Letters. 1976;62(1):60-63.
5. Sharma A, Sharma US. Liposomes in drug delivery: progress and?limitations. Intern J harmaceutics. 1997;154(2):123-140.
6. Samad, A, Sultana Y, Aqil M. Liposomal drug delivery systems: An update?review. Curr Drug Deliv. 2007;4(4):297-305.
7. Zhang L, Wang S, et al. Nanocarriers for oral drug delivery. J Drug Target.?2013;21(6):515-527.
8. Lelkes, PL and Friedman JE. J Biol chem. 1985; 260(3):1796-1803.
9. Zeevalk G, Bernard LP, Guilford FT. Liposomal-glutathione provides?maintenance of intracellular glutathione and neuroprotection in?mesencephalic neuronal cells. Neurochem Res. 2010;35(10):1575-1587.
10. Laouini A, Jaafar-Maalej C, Limayem-Blouza I, Sfar S, Charcosset C, Fessi?H. Preparation, characterization, and applications of liposomes: State of the?art. J Colloid Sci Biotechnol. 2012; 1:147-168.
11. Oku N, Namba Y. Long-circulating liposomes. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier?Syst. 1994;11(4):231-270.
12. Kesavan K, Nath G, Pandit JK. Sodium alginate based mucoadhesive?system for gatifloxacin and its in vitro actibacterial activity. Sci Pharm.?2010;78(4):941-957.
13. Hood RR, Andar A, et al. Pharmacy-on-a-chip: Microfluidic synthesis of?pegylated and folate receptor-targeted liposomes for drug delivery. 16th?International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life?Sciencies. 2012. Okinawa, Japan.
14. Klibanov AL, Maruyama K, Beckerleg AM, Torchilin VP, Huang L. Activity?of amphipathic poly(ethylene glycol) 5000 to prolong the circulation?time of liposomes depends on the liposome size and is unfavorable for?immunoliposome binding to target. Biochim Biophys Acta ? Biomembranes.
15. Allen TM, Hansen C, Martin F, et al. Liposomes containing synthetic lipid?derivatives of poly(ethylene glycol) show prolonged circulation half-lives in?vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta 1991;1066(1):29-36.